CSM8 needs a clean slate. Fourteen brand new, capable people to take their places on the CSM. To represent the player perspective to CCP Games.
Fortunately, that could be a possibility. Hans Jagerblitzen. Two Step. Alekseyev Karrde. Kelduum Revaan. These people have stated that they will not run for re-election.
Elise Randolph, I'm not entirely sure about. It's been indicated that he's not running, but I've yet to see that in writing. For now, we'll assume that he isn't. (Elise is the only CSM7 member I wouldn't mind on CSM8, but a clean slate is a clean slate.) (It has been confirmed that Elise is not running for re-election.)
Seleene needs to go. (It has been confirmed that Seleene is not running for re-election.) He does work, but not on par with the people named in the second and third paragraphs (excepting Kelduum from that list of course.) It's come to a point where it seems Seleene's only real desire for being on the council is that he craves having that inside scoop, his access to NDA material, misses his time as a developer at CCP. That's hardly a reason to be on the CSM, although it's certainly become the extent of his platform ("I used to work for CCP, who better to understand the culture and working environment. Blah blah blah.") He certainly wasn't Pandemic Legion's choice last year, that was Elise Randolph. Seleene squeaked in on name recognition alone.
(Hell, I think any former CCP employee should be excluded from running for the CSM. Stick that in the White Paper, CSM.)
Then there is Trebor. He really needs to go. He's been nothing but a string of bad ideas from start to finish this year. There have been some hints from him that CSM7 might be his last CSM, yet he's not said anything definitive. I think he may very well run. I also think he's been positioning himself as a highsec/carebear candidate all year, a re-election safety net. There was the voting debacle, in which he trumpeted for a new voting system, one that would limit the power of the nullsec voting blocs (a popular highsec platform.) In the most recent minutes, he argues against non-consensual wardecs, favouring mutual wardecs instead. He throws out the word griefing a number of times, and we all know the sort of buzzword griefing is to the carebear community.
The rest we can mostly ignore. They'll either get in because they have a large group of idiots backing them (Dovinian), or they won't because the voting population realized they were a waste of space on the council (Meissa, Issler, Darius III.) What the Russians will do is a mystery. I suppose UAxDEATH has a chance to get back in, maybe, his alliance is in a shambles, but it is now rebuilding under the CFC banner (though I doubt he'd get any official CFC backing.) As for Greene Lee, Against ALL Authorities hasn't completely disintegrated yet, so he probably has a better shot than UAxDEATH. (Although I have issues with Greene -- people without a strong command of the English language have no business on the CSM. English is the language CCP uses to communicate.)
There are a number of really strong candidates running for CSM8. Mynnna. Malcanis. Ripard Teg. To name three exceptionally well-known and respected candidates. Marc Scaurus is considering a campaign, he has a lot of respect from the community too. It would be cool if Pinky Feldman decided to run on the lowsec ticket. A number of these people will be part of the Iceland Seven.
The CSM needs new blood, and a new perspective. CSM7 has been far too chummy, too apologetic, too sycophantic towards CCP. A lot of that, no doubt, stems from Seleene's leadership, and Seleene's relationship with CCP. Instead of representing the players, we ended up with a bunch of people representing their own self-interest, and explaining away CCP missteps.
I'm not advocating an adversarial relationship between CSM8 and CCP. That's not going to get anyone anywhere. There has to be respect on both sides. But CSM8 has to enter their role, not looking for new pals and chums and Skype buddies, but to do a job. They aren't another marketing arm for CCP. We all want them to represent, to do their best to get shit done, to ensure CCP makes as few mistakes as possible, and to serve as proxies to the playerbase at large. We vote them because we feel they can best represent us.
If CCP Unifex wants to move CCP into new development directions, then we need new CSM members. No more of these three and four term people bogging down the proceedings with old methodologies.

"CSM7 has been far too chummy, too apologetic, too sycophantic towards CCP."
ReplyDelete:looks over to the 100 page threadnought:
Let me proudly be the first to say "lollolololololol ok bro, w/e you say"
I'm sure CCP felt properly put in their place after three-days of light castigation. Ooooh. Scary. I hope I never experience you shaking your finger at me.
DeleteI'm pretty sure Hans and Seleene spent most of the day apologizing for the Two Step threadnaught. Again. Chummy as hell. :)
DeleteFunny, because the minutes suggest CCP hand-waved away the fact it wasn't happening and there was little come-back on it. Basically, your failure.
DeleteAlso, is it possible to look like a more petulant child than you do? Each time I see you comment here I hope it's someone stealing your name, but it's not.
I actually have a bit of faith that during the bar crawls after each night that POSes were brought up with most of the CSM saying, "You know you just angered every single person that voted for us?".
Deletehey, are you running poetic?
ReplyDeleteNope.
DeleteI disagree with some of this. As a wormhole resident I really hope Two Step reconsiders (this is not likely). The POS issue needs to be pressed. If I were a cynical person I would say that CCP filled the CSM with promises of nice things at the beginning of their term and then renegged right when the CSM is at the end of its term and can no longer motivate the playing population against a bad decision.
ReplyDeleteA re-elected Two Step with the same resounding number of votes he got last time sends a very clear message to CCP on the issue. We are not a small part of the community. This needs to be fixed.
You might want to include Mangala Solaris from RvB as a candidate, and a strong one as he has our backing. :-)
ReplyDeleteElise isn't standing. For reference:
ReplyDeletehttps://twitter.com/eliserandolph/status/290898668029104131
Other than that, as always, I think you make a lot of interesting points in as passive-aggressive a tone as possible ;)
If I may say so, I think a lot of this goes back to the same issue I discussed on CZ17 re: these sorts of people gravitating towards one another and forming friendships first and foremost making it difficult to get work done. I think there is a genuine fear in CSM7 that if they play too much hard-ball, CCP will just cut them out the loop all together.
Passive-aggressive? Nah. Just aggressive.
DeleteAnd I remember that Twitter thing Elise wrote. It just didn't seem like a refusal to run. If he's having so much fun, then it makes no sense not to run again.
But whatever. Clean slate and all.
If Mynnna gets 10k votes I hope it's burn jita v2
ReplyDeleteHere at Goon HQ we are already deciding who the next 14 CSM members will be.
ReplyDeleteHey, I did exactly what I promised to and I have been active in CSM discussions. You'll find me in skype at least 8 hours a day and active in the CSM private channel. Also in the forums. I just don't spend any time saying "look at me working really hard!" You know what else "works hard" washing machines.
ReplyDeleteSorry you aren't impressed but then again I didn't run to impress you.
And for anyone that has bothered to ask I am not running again either.
Issler
All that matters is whether you impressed the people that voted for you.
DeleteNo complaints to date.
DeleteBy the way, I do enjoy your posts and you involvement in the CSM 8 elections is something I am excited to get to watch from the sidelines.
Issler
Thank you for your time and effort in CSM7.
DeleteIt was nice to have someone supporting mining and industry.
Indeed. Thanks for standing for our game in spite of the flackstorm thrown at you.
DeleteApologies, Poetic, but your argument against Trebor boils down to (in my opinion) "Trebor plays the game differently from me. He has to go."
ReplyDeleteYes he's a carebear. So what? A lot of EVE subscribers are carebears. Their concerns need to be addressed or the CSM loses (even more) credibility with CCP.
People should realize that the size carebear player base far exceeds the size of the Low/Null sec player base. They are a heel of allot less vocal and like a different style of play then PvP!
ReplyDeleteMy numbers may be wrong but I remember reading from CCP saying something like 70% or more of players nave NEVER entered low or null sec!